MindLens·Lab

Emotional Intelligence Research · Phase 1

Research for the people who struggle to read emotion in others

First target of 500 for the first preprint (13 Aug 2026)

Next target for the second preprint

504 / 500readings

100%

See progress →

What we're seeing so far

Thanks to participants so far, here's what the study is beginning to show.

The emotions readers agree on… and don't

↑ Most agreed

Sad / sorry
72%
Happy / amused
72%
Moved / touched
71%
Angry / frustrated
64%
Embarrassed / awkward
61%
Anxious / nervous
53%
Disappointed
46%
Proud
40%

↓ Most divergent

Bar length = modal share, the % of readers who chose the top emotion on the clips where that emotion led. High = readers converged; low = readers split. Only emotions with enough clip appearances are shown.

Which signals did readers rely on?

Facial expression
70%
The situation
52%
Tone of voice
51%
Body language / posture
51%
What they said
45%
How others reacted
14%
Timing / pauses
8%
I wasn't sure
1%

Multiple signals allowed per reading, so shares exceed 100% in aggregate.

Featured pre-registered claim

H1

Plurality is the norm, not the exception.

We predict median modal share under 70%, and fewer than 20% of qualifying clips showing high consensus.

Median modal share (H1 predicts <70%)

67% under threshold ✓

High-consensus clips (H1 predicts <20%)

12% under threshold ✓

Soft support. Full test at N ≥ 5 readers per clip. Analysis plan pre-registered before data collection began.

H1 is one of 8 pre-registered hypotheses — the foundational one. The others need more data or are more technical; see them all at /research/hypotheses.

No scoring, no leaderboard. Your reading joins a research dataset — that's it.

Returning? Sign in →

Where to learn more

The depth lives on the other pages.